Search Results for "attachment orders"

665 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 665 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to External Account Freeze. Dishonour Attributable to Police Investigation Freeze Order, Not Insufficiency of Funds Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Rendering Proceedings Unsustainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal petition filed by Petitioners and its directors seeking to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Third-Party Claim in Execution Proceedings -- Appellant Fails to Remove Property Attachment for Arbitral Award Recovery -- Mother of Company Director Cannot Defeat Creditor's Rights as Post-Award Purchaser

The Supreme Court upheld the attachment of property in execution of an arbitral award, rejecting the third-party claim by Appellant who had purchased ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor Under Section 144 CPC When Decree Varied and Decree Holder Purchased Property in Auction. Auction Sale Set Aside Due to Variation of Decree and Lack of Bona Fide Purchaser Status.

The appeal arose from a restitution application under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The original plaintiff (decree holder) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Attachment of Decreetal Amount for Unpaid Legal Fees Under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. Legal Practitioner's Claim for Professional Fees and Expenses Upheld as the Only Property of the Defendant Was the Decreetal Amount in Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioner, a legal practitioner, filed a suit for recovery of unpaid professional fees and expenses amounting to Rs.1,42,975/- against the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Possession Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy Before DRT Must Be Exhausted. Writ Petition Not Maintainable as SARFAESI Act Provides Complete Mechanism for Aggrieved Persons Under Section 17.

The petitioners, Dr. Anil Nandkishor Tibrewala and his wife, owned a flat in Mumbai. They had mortgaged the flat to Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. (respo...