Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material — Prior Scrutiny Assessment Cannot Be Reopened on Same Issues Without New Tangible Material

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, a company engaged in electricity generation for the State of Maharashtra, challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal's Deletion of Addition on Transport Creditors Upheld. Assessee's claim for transport creditors allowed as ITAT found no justification for addition under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 27.11.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CSR Expenditure Deduction Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CSR Expenditure Held to Be Incurred Wholly and Exclusively for Business Purposes. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Voltas Limited, a company engaged in air conditioning and refrigeration business, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in MODVAT Credit Deduction Case Under Section 43B of Income Tax Act. Unutilised MODVAT Credit and Sales Tax Recoverable Account Not Allowable as Deduction Without Actual Payment of Excise Duty Liability.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. against the Delhi High Court judgment dated 07.12.2017, which upheld the disallowance ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Tax Appeal to ITAT for Fresh Adjudication Due to Erroneous Factual Findings. Revenue Expenditure Dispute Over Rs. 3.25 Crore Payment to Promoter Requires Re-examination by Tribunal.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) which had...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Severance Pay Amortization Case. ITAT's order allowing amortization of severance pay under Section 35DDA of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld despite cessation of business.

The Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 5th September 2011, which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Asset Management Company Tax Case — Notional Addition Based on SEBI Ceiling Not Permissible. Investment advisory fees actually charged, not the maximum permissible under SEBI regulations, constitute taxable income.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the CIT (A)'s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Reference on Subsidy and Section 35CC Deduction. Central Government Subsidy Not to Reduce Actual Cost for Depreciation Under Section 43(1) of Income-tax Act, 1961; Deduction Under Section 35CC(1) Not Denied for Non-Filing of Statement of Expenditure.

This is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to the Bombay High Court. The reference ari...