High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "adverse finding"
3095 result(s) found
Found 3095 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Bajaj Electricals Ltd, Upholds Closure of Diecasting Division as Genuine. Industrial Court's finding of functional integrality between diecasting and fan divisions reversed; closure held valid under Section 25O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
3 Jul 2018The Petitioner, Bajaj Electricals Limited, had a factory at Chakan, Pune, comprising two divisions: a diecasting division and a fan division. The diec...
- 73
High Court
Arbitration Amidst Disputed Insurance Claims. Navigating jurisdictional challenges and contractual non-disclosure in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
19 Dec 2024A Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award for its alleged failur...
- 301
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC in a Land Title and Possession Dispute Between Two Educational Trusts. The Appeal Arises from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration, Permanent and Mandatory Injunction by the Trial Court.
25 Sep 2013The dispute involved two educational trusts, the Golden Valley Educational Trust (plaintiff) and the Vokkaligara Sangha (defendant), over land granted...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Against Execution of Decree for Possession, Holding That Objectors Claiming Adverse Possession Must First Establish Their Own Independent Title. Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections Cannot Be Used to Re-litigate Title Already Decided Against the Judgment Debtor.
13 Oct 2010The present appeals arise from execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (respondent No. 1) to enforce a decree for possession of land adme...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. Co-owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Another Co-owner Without Ouster Under Section 100 CPC.
11 Jan 2018The appellant, Suresh Chatra, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree da...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.
22 Jun 2024The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...
- 112
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Adverse Possession Case, Upholds Plaintiffs' Right to Possession. State Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Private Citizens; Implied Admission of Title by Pleading Adverse Possession Under Order VIII Rule 5 CPC.
1 Jan 2024The dispute pertains to a piece of land measuring 18 Biswas Pukhta comprised in Khasra No. 2348 and Khasra No. 2458, situated in Bahadurgarh, Haryana,...
- 625
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Termination of Concession Agreement — Upholds Arbitral Award Restored by Earlier Judgment. Court Holds That Curative Jurisdiction Under Article 142 Is Not Available to Re-Argue Merits Where No Miscarriage of Justice Is Shown.
10 Apr 2024The Supreme Court dismissed a curative petition filed by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) against its earlier judgment in Delhi Airport Metro Expre...
- 2078
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Licence Revocation and Adverse Possession. Court holds that licence granted for construction is revocable under Section 62 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, and that mere long possession does not establish adverse possession without proof of hostile animus.
9 Oct 2025The present second appeal arises from a property dispute between two brothers, Madhukar Bholaram Hatwalne (original defendant) and Yeshwant Bholaram H...
- 171
