High Court of Bombay hears Writ Petition challenging customs action. No further details available.
13 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "admissibility ratio"
152 result(s) found
Found 152 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent and Age Discrepancy Cast Doubt on Prosecution Case, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.
11 Aug 2023The appellant, Mahesh Bhimraj Jadhav, was convicted by the Designated Court under the POCSO Act for the rape of a 17-year-old girl. The prosecution al...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Impounding Order Under Karnataka Stamp Act for Non-Compliance with Section 33 Procedure. Deficit Stamp Duty and Penalty Levied Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.
17 Feb 2021The petitioner, who was the second defendant in an eviction suit (O.S.No.5192/2011) pending before the III Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, fil...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unnatural Conduct of Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 506 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
20 Oct 2020The appellant, Rahul Limbaji Thorat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of his wife Vandana under Sections 302 a...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that where the deceased was driving a motorcycle without a valid driving license and contributed to the accident, the claimants are not entitled to full compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
26 Sep 2019The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of a deceased motorcyclist. The deceased was riding a motorcycle when h...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance Appeal in Agricultural Land Sale Contract — Oral Agreement Proved by Evidence and Part Performance. Court holds that Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act does not mandate written agreement for sale of immovable property; oral agreement coupled with earnest money and possession is sufficient for decree of specific performance.
6 Jun 2019The present second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement for sale of agricultural land. The appellant, Kerba Dhengle...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Even if Used for Exempted Goods Prior to Common Use. The court held that the restriction under Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply when capital goods are used for both exempted and dutiable goods, and the assessee is entitled to credit if the goods are used in the manufacture of final products.
20 Jun 2018The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru, under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders of...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Trust and Coverage Dispute. Majority Award Upheld as Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
21 Jan 2013The petitioner, The New India Insurance Company Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 July 2009 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal un...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Succession and Title — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership. Succession Certificate Not Conclusive Proof of Title; Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right to Property.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of title and possession of a property. He claimed t...
- 89
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeals Against Insolvency Resolution of Personal Guarantors Under IBC — Jurisdiction of Adjudicating Authority Upheld. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority has jurisdiction to entertain applications under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against personal guarantors residing abroad, and that the moratorium under Section 96 applies to all assets of the guarantor.
30 Nov -0001The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai dismissed two appeals filed by Iqbal Jumabhoy and Hussain Somjee, personal guarantors o...
- 154
