Search Results for "Workmen Compensation"

672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Reference in Industrial Dispute Against Minority School — Lack of Jurisdiction Under Industrial Disputes Act. School Employee's Dispute Not an 'Industrial Dispute' as School is Not an 'Industry' Under Section 2(j) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Amalorpavam Higher Secondary School, an unaided private minority school recognized under the National Commission for Minority Educatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status for Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Workmen. TNMSC Employees Secured Their Rights Under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments Act, 1981, After a Protracted Legal Battle

The Court has addressed cross appeals involving the Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited (TNMSC) and its employees' union regarding the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Educational Society Against Labour Court Orders Granting Compensation to Workman. Employer's failure to prove abandonment of service and non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 leads to reinstatement with back wages.

The Karnataka Lingayat Education Society and its affiliated college, C.B. Kore Polytechnic, filed multiple writ petitions challenging orders of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order Under Section 10-A of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 — Summary Deposit Cannot Be Ordered When Employer Denies Liability. Employer-Employee Relationship Disputed, Commissioner Must Follow Regular Procedure Under the Act.

The Petitioner, Prompt Landmarks Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, challenged an order dated 4 May 2013 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Workmen Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of 18 workmen by M/s. Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd. held illegal for non-compliance with mandatory retrenchment provisions.

The petitioners, 18 workmen, were employed by M/s. Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd. They were terminated without any notice or retrenchment compensation. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...