Search Results for "Void Alienation"

402 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 402 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956.

The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Daughter Entitled to Half Share in Ancestral and Self-Acquired Properties. Daughter's claim for partition upheld as co-parcenary rights under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 apply equally to daughter and son.

The appellant, Smt. P L Nanjamma, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Against Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit on Ground of Limitation. The Suit Sought Declarations That a 1946 Will Prohibited Alienation of Property and That a 2012 Sale Deed Was Void.

The matter arose from a civil suit filed by Anand Madanmohan Jaiswal (appellant) against Smt Pratibha w/o Rammohan Jaiswal and M/s Shewalkar Developer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals and Cross Objection in Specific Performance and Possession Dispute Over KHB Allotted House. Agreement Holder Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...