Search Results for "UAPA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "UAPA"

123 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Second Bail Application Under PMLA Citing Long Incarceration and Speedy Trial Rights. The Court Examines Whether Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial Can Override Section 45 PMLA Bail Restrictions When Trial Is Delayed and Accused Has Been in Custody for Prolonged Period.

1 Jul 2026

The petitioner, accused No.1 in an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for offences under Sectio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in KCOCA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Organised Crime Syndicate. Court Held That Prosecution Failed to Establish Existence of Organised Crime Syndicate Under Section 3 of Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act, 2000, Thus Stringent Bail Conditions Not Attracted.

28 Nov 2024

The petitioner, accused no.1 in Crime No.8/2022 registered by Bharathi Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 465, 46...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in KCOCA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Organised Crime Syndicate. Petitioner, accused of cheating and forgery, was granted bail as prosecution failed to establish that he was part of an organised crime syndicate under Section 3 of Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act, 2000.

28 Nov 2024

The petitioner, John Moses D @ Madan Kumar, accused no.1 in Crime No.8/2022 registered by Bharathi Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Failure to File Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 21(4) of NIA Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) CrPC mandates release on bail if investigation not completed within statutory period.

19 Dec 2023

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, was arrested on 14.04.2020 in connection with FIR No. RC 01/2020/NIA/Mum registered by the National Investigating A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bail Appeal in NIA Case — Accused No.16 in Terror Conspiracy Case Denied Bail Due to Prima Facie Involvement and Flight Risk. The court held that the accused's active participation in the conspiracy and the serious nature of offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 warranted denial of bail.

15 Jun 2023

The appellant, Zabiulla @ Zabibulla, accused No.16 in Spl.C.C.No.320/2020, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation A...

High Court

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Financial Fraud Case Involving Rs. 17.5 Crore Investment — Petitioner Enlarged on Bail with Conditions. Court held that since investigation is complete and charge sheet filed, custodial interrogation is not necessary, and bail can be granted with stringent conditions under Section 439 CrPC.

10 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Shreesha Sasithota Prabhakaran, Accused No.1, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, see...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Murder Case on Grounds of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellants Accused of Murder Under Section 302 IPC and Offences Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Granted Bail as Co-Accused Already Released.

1 Jul 2022

The appellants, accused Nos. 1 and 4, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the NIA Act challenging the order dated 21.04.2021 passed by the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NIA Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities — Conviction under Section 121 IPC and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Set Aside. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt as the evidence was insufficient and the alleged confessions were inadmissible.

23 Jun 2022

The case involves an appeal by Ghayur Ahmad Jamali and Aftab Alam @ Farooq (accused Nos. 3 and 4) against their conviction and sentence by the XLIX Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

20 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Furlough Rule Denying Furlough to Prisoners from Outside Maharashtra. Classification Based on Residence Held Reasonable Under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution.

20 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)