Search Results for "Treasury Deposit"

214 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 214 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Does Not Lapse as Possession Was Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Interpretation That 'Or' in Section 24(2) Means 'Nor' or 'And', Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Collector's Appeal Against High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Partially Taken and Interim Period Excluded, Applying Indore Development Authority Over Pune Municipal Corporation.

The dispute involved an appeal against a High Court order that declared land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Delhi Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Declaration of Lapse. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken and Compensation Released, Despite Illegal Occupation by Encroachers.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case in Delhi, where the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a High Court judgment that decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 When Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Court Stay, and Stay Period Must Be Excluded from Five-Year Computation.

The dispute originated from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent landowner filed a writ petitio...