Search Results for "Transport Inspector"

287 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 287 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Licensee in Essential Commodities Act Case for Lack of Mandatory Sanction. Prosecution for Illegal Diesel Transportation Fails as No Sanction Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Was Obtained.

The petitioner, Sadiq Pasha, a licensed transporter of diesel and operator of SWS & Sons Petrol Bunk, challenged the FIR in Crime No.137/2022 register...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Bus Conductor Challenging Dismissal for Misappropriation. Industrial Court's Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 Upheld as Labour Court's Reinstatement Order Was Perverse.

The petitioner, Khanderao Punjabrao Mundhe, was employed as a bus conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) in 1979. On ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Externment Orders Under Maharashtra Police Act — Clarifies Conditions for Section 56(1)(a) and (b) and Requirement of Witness Fear. The court held that each clause has distinct requirements and the authority must apply mind to proportionality and natural justice.

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeals by Insurance Company and Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Upheld. Compensation Award of Rs. 7,50,000 Confirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of Balkrushna Khandagale, who died in a collision between a motorcycle ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Suspension of Vehicle Registration for Violation of Natural Justice — Prescribed Authority Exceeded Powers Under Section 53(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Order Set Aside as No Show Cause Notice or Hearing Was Given Before Suspending Registration of Maruti Van.

The petitioner, Ganesh s/o Jaglal Jaiswal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur challenging an order passed by the...