Search Results for "Trade union recognition"

635 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 635 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Not Liable for Wages During Lockout Period Due to Binding Settlement. Settlement Between Union and Employer Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act Precludes Claim for Wages for Period of No Work.

The appellant, M/s. Mehta Gem Tools Private Limited, challenged an order of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 255...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanent Status to Daily Wage Workers. Workers Employed for 240 Days Entitled to Permanency Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (an agricultural university) and its research station, challenged the judgment and order dated 08/08/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Workers Challenging Industrial Court Order Refusing Stay of Union Election. Held that the Industrial Court's order was not perverse and did not suffer from any jurisdictional error, and the writ court's supervisory jurisdiction did not warrant interference.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by 25 workers (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing thei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...