Madras High Court Adjudicates Cross-Petitions for Rectification of Trade Mark Register Under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Dispute Involves Competing Claims for Removal of Respective Registered Marks in Class 9.
20 Feb 2025...
Search Results for "Trade Marks Registry"
142 result(s) found
Found 142 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark Registration for 'ABACUS' in Educational Services — Petitioner's Prior Use and Reputation Established. The Court held that the mark 'ABACUS' is descriptive and not inherently distinctive, but the petitioner had acquired secondary meaning through long and extensive use since 1987.
8 Jan 2025The petitioner, Abacus Montessori School, filed a rectification petition seeking removal of the trademark registration No. 1586733 in Class 41 for 'AB...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Lack of Willful Disobedience in IP Infringement Case. Court finds that the alleged new label/trade dress of the respondents was not identical or deceptively similar to the petitioner's FEVICOL MR artistic work, bottle, and glue pens, and thus did not violate the consent decree.
13 Aug 2024The petitioner, Pidilite Industries Ltd., filed a contempt petition against the respondents, Premier Stationery Industries Pvt. Ltd. and others, alleg...
- 594
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over 'SUKOON' Mark for Ayurvedic Massage Oil. Plaintiff's Prior Use Since 1993 and Distinctive Label Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Defendant's Identical Mark.
26 Oct 2016The plaintiff, Shafeeque Ahmed Mohammad Sayeed, trading as M/s. Nageena Ayurvedic Pharmacy, filed a suit against the defendant, Ansari Bilal Ahmadlal ...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.
24 Oct 2016The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks 'MONTINA' and 'MONTINAL'. Phonetic Similarity Between Registered Mark 'MONTINA' and Defendants' Mark 'MONTINAL' for Medicinal Preparations Constitutes Infringement Under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
24 Dec 2013The Plaintiff, Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, who were manufacturin...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving Beer Labels. Plaintiff's mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be infringed by defendant's use of '5000' in similar label, as numeral is an essential feature not descriptive of beer strength.
5 Sep 2011The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Som Distilleries & Breweries Li...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to IPAB Order Rejecting Additional Documents in Trade Mark Dispute Over 'Laxman Rekha'. Court Held That IPAB's Discretion to Refuse Additional Evidence at Appellate Stage Was Not Shown to Be Perverse or Unreasonable.
26 Oct 2010The petitioner, Sudhir Bhatia, trading as M/s V. Bhatia International, and respondent No.3, Midas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd., were involved in a dis...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant for Using Deceptively Similar Trademark 'RABITAL' in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'REVITAL' held to be a well-known coined word, and defendant's mark 'RABITAL' found phonetically and structurally similar, likely to cause confusion.
27 Oct 2005The plaintiff, Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, a pharmaceutical company, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendant, ...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Passing Off Suit Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC — Assignment of Trade Mark to Third Party Constitutes Subsequent Event Justifying Impleadment and Amendment. The court held that amendment is necessary for effective adjudication and does not change the nature of the suit.
2 Feb 2005The plaintiff, Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal, Karta of M/s. R.M. Dhariwal (HUF) and others, filed a suit (Suit No. 574 of 2004) against Kishore Washwan...
- 84
