Search Results for "Subjective satisfaction"

905 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 905 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Preventive detention set aside as criminal activities did not disturb public order, only law and order.

The petitioner, Sangita Nandu Toradmal, mother of the detenue Sanket @ Khoonkhar Dadya Nandu Toradmal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Externment Order Under Section 55 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 for Lack of Material to Show Threat to Public Order. Single pending criminal case and rowdy sheet entry insufficient to justify externment from home district.

The petitioner, Sachin M.R., a permanent resident of Mallahalli Village, Mysore District, challenged an externment order dated 20.03.2024 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Police Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Order under Section 55 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 set aside as authority did not consider whether proceedings under Section 107 of CrPC would suffice.

The petitioner, a resident of Kunigal Taluk, challenged an externment order dated 15-12-2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Sub Divisional M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Supply of Incriminating Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused and Call Data Records Not Furnished.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vilas Vithal Ambokar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 10th April 2015 passed by the Principal Secreta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Placement of Vital Bail Order. The court held that failure to place the detailed bail order before the Detaining Authority vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

The petitioner, Shobha Dattatray Bodake, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive detention ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Material. Detenu's Dismissal from CISF for Alleged Smuggling Involvement Not Considered, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Avatar Meena, father-in-law of the detenu Muralilal Meena, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 August 2013 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...