Search Results for "Sub-division"

170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Public Property. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The petitioners-defendants filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 29.09.2023 passed by the Senior Civil Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order — Employee Entitled to CRTE Under Kalelkar Settlement. Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU & PULP Act for Failure to Convert NMR Employee to Regular Establishment After Five Years.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of the Industrial Court dated 04.08.2008 in Complaint (ULP) N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reversion of Workman from Mukadam to Labourer Held Unjustified. Employer Cannot Benefit from Its Own Mistake in Showing Designation as Mukadam in Proposal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the employer (Superintending Engineer and others) challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, whi...