Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

297 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Petition Against NCDRC Order in Housing Society Dispute — Policy Repudiation Upheld Due to Breach of Condition Regarding Unauthorized Construction. The court held that the insurer was justified in repudiating the claim as the insured failed to disclose material facts about unauthorized construction, which was a fundamental breach of policy conditions.

15 Dec 2025

The petitioner, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 4 Decemb...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to 399-Day Delay — Condonation Denied for Lack of Sufficient Cause. Internal administrative delays and employee turnover held not sufficient to explain each day of delay under Section 51 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

6 Aug 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by SBI General Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal on Execution in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession of Real Estate Unit. State Commission's Order Dismissing Execution Application Upheld as No Grounds for Interference Made Out.

9 May 2025

The case involves an appeal on execution filed by Shellender Singh under Section 27-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, challenging the order date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal, Holds Borrower of Project Loan Not a Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Loan availed for commercial purpose of film post-production excludes company from consumer definition under Section 2(1)(d)(ii).

28 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 30.08.2023. The ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Housing Board Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cancellation of Registration — Limitation Bar Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Applied. The Court held that the consumer complaint filed 11 years after cancellation was time-barred and the allottee was in default.

11 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Rajasthan Housing Board against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute, Interpreting Limitation Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) bars recovery of additional charges from the date the sum first became due, based on billing error, and remanded the case for fresh consideration.

5 Oct 2021

The dispute arose when the appellant, a cotton yarn manufacturer in Panipat, Haryana, received a short assessment notice from the electricity distribu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds National Consumer Commission's Order in Builder-Resident Association Dispute Over Apartment Amenities. Cause of Action for Deficiency in Services Continued Beyond Agreement Date, Making Complaint Within Limitation Period Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and Builder Directed to Fulfill Contractual Obligations for Amenities.

28 Sep 2021

The dispute arose between a builder, M/s Padmini Infrastructure Developers (India) Ltd., and the Royale Garden Residents Welfare Association, represen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules HUDA v. Sunita, Holds Statutory Bodies Amenable to Consumer Protection Act for Services Rendered for Consideration. The Court ruled that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 applies to statutory authorities providing services for consideration, and sovereign functions are exempt only if strictly understood.

16 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference arising from an order dated 13.07.2018, where a two-judge Bench doubted the correctness of HUDA v. Sunita (20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Appointment of Full-Time Presidents for District Consumer Forums in Goa. Failure to appoint full-time Presidents violates the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and defeats its objectives.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Shri Arjun Virnodkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking a direction for the appointment of a full-time...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Consumer Forum Orders Against Company in Liquidation — Jurisdiction of Consumer Forum Barred After Appointment of Official Liquidator Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that once a winding up order is passed, the Company Court has exclusive jurisdiction over the company's assets, and the Consumer Forum cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Sandhu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking to quash orders dated 17.10.2006, ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)