Search Results for "Special Meeting"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Special Meeting"

3093 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3093 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat Samiti Party Leadership Dispute Under Maharashtra Local Authorities Members Disqualification Act. District Collector's Approval of New Party Leader Upheld as Valid Based on Majority Resolution and Definition of Panchayat Samiti Party Under Section 2(l).

1 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the removal of the appellant as Party Leader (Gatneta) of the INCPS Party, a Panchayat Samiti party formed by members elected o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order and Remands Dispute in No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Proper service of notice on all panchayat members is mandatory, and disputed duty of service necessitated fresh inquiry to determine if actual or alternate service was effected as per Bombay Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Upasarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

23 Sep 2016

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Upa-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Belgaon Tarale, Taluka Igatpuri, District Nashik. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes District Collector's Order Setting Aside No Confidence Motion Against Upsarpanch. No Confidence Motion Valid Despite Discrepancy in Reasons, as Expression of Want of Confidence Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

14 Oct 2025

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion moved against the Upsarpanch of Group Grampanchayat, Adkhal, Taluka Dapoli, District Ratnagiri. The Gram...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Failure to Hold Gram Panchayat Meetings — Procedural Violation Found in Ex-Parte Order. Additional Collector's order set aside as no notice or opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner before declaring her disqualified under Section 7 read with Section 76 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

16 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Sow. Pratibha w/o Sanjay Hulle, was the elected Sarpanch of Village Grampanchayat Waigaon. An application was received by the Addition...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.

14 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Collector's Orders Upholding No-Confidence Motions Passed Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Section 54D Procedure Requiring Secret Ballot in Gram Sabha Does Not Prevail Over Section 35 Power of Elected Panchayat Members, Both Provisions Operate Independently.

19 Mar 2015

The Bombay High Court addressed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Additional Collector, Gadchiroli, which had set aside no-confidence mot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

6 Apr 2010

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Alteration of Share Capital — Interim Relief Granted to Protect Plaintiff's Rights Pending Suit. The court held that the plaintiff, a director, had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim injunction against the company and other directors regarding the alteration of share capital from Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in the Memorandum of Association.

1 Aug 2017

The case involves a dispute within a family-owned company, H. Fillunger & Company Pvt. Ltd., where the plaintiff, Ajit Arvind Marathe, a director, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)