Search Results for "Speaker's jurisdiction"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Sexual Assault of Minor Girl Under POCSO Act and IPC. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Despite Absence of Independent Witnesses.

The appellant, Babu @ Prabhakar Sakharam Karve, was convicted by the Designated Judge under the POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, in POCSO Special Case No.48...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness, a child relative of the deceased, gave inconsistent and tutored testimony, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Avinash @ Pinya Ashok Jadhav, was convicted by the 4th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court, Sewree, Mumbai, for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap failed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap did not succeed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Municipal Councillors for Defying Invalid Party Whip. Whip Issued by District President Not Binding Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1987.

The petitioners, Sahebrao Narayan Kharat, Bagwan Tamijabee Shaikh Ahmed, and Shaikh Khurshid Ahemad Gulam Jilani, were elected members of the Municipa...