Search Results for "Section 19(3) sanction"

135 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 135 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction of Complainant for Perjury in Corruption Case Due to Procedural Irregularities and Lack of Mens Rea. Trial Court's Suo Motu Conviction Without Following Section 340 CrPC and Without Affording Hearing is Unsustainable.

The appellant, Prashant Gopalrao Chandane, was the de facto complainant in a corruption case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against one ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Approver in MCOCA Case Due to Long Incarceration and No Likelihood of Trial Conclusion. Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Prevails Over Stringent Provisions of MCOCA.

The applicant, Danish Ali Jamaluddin Ahmed, was arrested on 1 December 2018 in connection with FIR No. 326 of 2018 (later renumbered as FIR No. 36 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cognizance Order in SC/ST Act Case — Holds That Special Court Can Take Cognizance Directly and That High Court's Refusal to Quash Proceedings Was Not Erroneous.

The case involves a special leave petition filed by Ramveer Upadhyay and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...