Search Results for "SEBI Act 1992"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "SEBI Act 1992"

106 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Over Land Transfer. Section 9 of Arbitration Act Does Not Confer Right to Injunction Against Third Party Transferee Without Prima Facie Case of Fraud or Collusion.

13 Aug 2025

The appellants, Vasudev Garg, Chaitanya Garg, and Radhika Baig, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Public Premises Act Case — Prima Facie Satisfaction Sufficient for Eviction Notice. The Court held that the Estate Officer's satisfaction under Section 4(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 need only be prima facie based on material on record, and the appellate court cannot substitute its own findings at the notice stage.

10 May 2024

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by a government company (wholly owned by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Loss Set-off Case. Loss from derivatives trading on recognized stock exchange held not speculative under Section 43(5)(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961, and can be set off against other business income under Section 70.

6 May 2022

The appellant, Souvenir Developers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a domestic company deriving income from toll collection business and also trading in shares and d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Airport Authority's Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction in Lease Dispute with Hotel Company. Court holds that a lessor cannot restrain lessee from creating third-party rights in assets or shareholding without a contractual bar, and that the lessee's use of FSI from one plot for construction on another does not constitute breach of lease terms.

18 Oct 2019

The appellant, Airport Authority of India (AAI), a statutory authority under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, filed an appeal against an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in MPID Act Case — Intercorporate Deposits Not Covered Under MPID Act. Loan advanced by one company to another company registered under Companies Act, 1956 does not constitute a 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Ashish Mahendrakar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

24 Aug 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Valuers in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act as Complainant Failed to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act is rebuttable and the complainant must prima facie show a legally enforceable debt.

6 Dec 2017

The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed by Ramesh Dahyalal Shah, Yardi Prabhu Consultants & Valuers Pvt. Ltd., and Ashwinkumar Shet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Secured Creditor IDBI in Company Petition for Oppression and Mismanagement — Upholds CLB Order Refusing Interim Relief. Court holds that a secured creditor cannot maintain a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 for alleged mismanagement, as the remedy lies under the SARFAESI Act or other recovery laws.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India Ltd. (IDBI), a secured creditor, against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the complainant must prove that the demand notice was sent to the correct address of the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due, failing which the complaint is not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Prabhakar Dattatraya Gune, Sanjay Chandrakant Kirloskar, and M.V. P...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)