Search Results for "Rule 12-A"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Delay in Deposit of Balance Sale Consideration Condoned. The court held that the conditional decree was satisfied by deposit under court orders, and the judgment-debtor's right to rescind was lost as he did not seek rescission before deposit.

The appellant, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of 3.75 acres of land dated 14.11.2011, wherein the respondent, agreed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Grant of Unconditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit — Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Respondent Raised Triable Issues Including Subsequent Settlement Agreement and Validity of Electronic Evidence.

The Petitioner, M/s. Mobile Arts S.A.L., a company incorporated in Lebanon providing digital advertising services, filed a Commercial Summary Suit (No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Order for Not Giving Effect to ITAT Directions — Refund of Rs. 40,06,299/- Ordered. The impugned order failed to correctly implement the ITAT's order and erroneously computed tax liability, leading to a direction for fresh computation and refund.

The petitioner, Ayyappa Seva Samgham Bombay, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Cancellation of Flat Allotment for Non-Payment Due to Non-Issuance of Demand Letter. Petitioner's Allotment Cannot Be Cancelled Without Issuance of Formal Demand Letter Under Regulation 18(1) of MHADA (Disposal of Land) Regulations, 1992.

The petitioner, Sandeep Uttam Bodke, applied for allotment of a flat under the Lower Income Group (LIG) category in response to an advertisement issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition of Tenanted Premises Without Notice. Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Due Process Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Before Demolishing Structures Occupied by Tenants.

The petitioners, Mrs. Lilly P. Pandit, Mr. Ivan D'Souza, and Mr. Abbas Masalawala, are tenants residing in rooms on the ground floor of 30 Mistry Buil...