Search Results for "Regulation 20(5)"

197 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 197 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging De-registration of Housing Federation in Ongoing Real Estate Project — RERA Rule 9(1)(ii) Overrides MCS Act for Formation of Apex Body Before Project Completion.

The petitioner, Lodha Belmondo Housing Federation Ltd., a federation registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Selection Process for Technical Assistant Posts. Revision of Category-Wise Vacancies After Written Examination Does Not Change Rules of the Game When Done to Fulfill Reservation Mandates.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a High Court judgment that quashed the selection process for 6628 posts of Technical Assistant (Group-C) in th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Voluntary Retirement Due to Pending Disciplinary Proceedings and CBI Investigation. Rule 56(k) of CCS Rules Does Not Confer Unilateral Right to Retire When Serious Allegations Are Under Investigation.

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjay Sharma, joined Tata Memorial Hospital as Assistant Surgeon on 29th November 1985 and was later appointed Professor of Surge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Builder's Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suits — Agreements to Sell Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled. The court held that without a concluded contract, no prima facie case exists for interim injunction under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s Rupji Constructions, a partnership firm engaged in construction business, entered into several agreements to sell with various flat...