Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employees' Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court's Refusal to Register Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act. Industrial Court Cannot Reject Revision at Threshold on Ground of Interlocutory Order.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees challenging the refusal of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar, to register their Revision (U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Directed to Reinstate Employee with Back Wages. Abandonment of Service Claim Rejected as Employee Reported for Duty After Maternity Leave.

The present petition was filed by Finlay Mills challenging an order dated 4.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay in Complaint (ULP) No.169 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC's Petition, Sets Aside Condonation of Delay in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Pendency of Criminal Case and Acquittal Not Sufficient Cause to Condone Delay in Challenging Departmental Punishment Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) and its Divisional Traffic Officer filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Industri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Successive Recognition Application Under Section 14 of MRTU & PULP Act. No One-Year Bar Exists After Disposal of Previous Application; Only Bar is Within One Year of Recognition of Another Union.

The case involves a challenge by the Petitioner Union, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, which was a recognized trade union in the undertaking of Respondent No.2...