Search Results for "MHADA land"

280 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Seeking Full Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA. Petition Challenges Partial Grant of Deemed Conveyance, Excluding Chawl and Access Areas, Citing Incomplete Consideration of Agreements.

The petitioner, a co-operative housing society registered in 1971, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition on Urban Land Ceiling Act Repeal and Possession — Court Analyzes Validity of Dispossession Under Section 10(5) and (6) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Vijay Kisan Kate, approached the High Court of Bombay by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — Petitioners Failed to Show Entitlement to Surplus Land or Compliance with Statutory Requirements

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by various individuals challenging the acquisition of their lands under the Urban Land (Ceiling ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974.

The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Demolition by Municipal Corporation in Land Dispute Over Survey No.123, Hissa 1A. Appellants' Right to Reconstruction Upheld After Wrongful Demolition During Subsistence of Interim Order.

The case involves two appeals filed by Chotelal Ramkaran Yadav and Jaggu Chauthi Yadav against the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...