Search Results for "MACT claim"

734 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 734 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Future Prospects and Consortium. Deceased's income reassessed with 25% future prospects and Rs. 70,000 per claimant for loss of consortium under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the legal heirs of deceased Ganesh Tayade, who died in a motor accident on 16 November 2006 when a truck owned by respondent n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Motor Accident Claims Appeals Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act. Appeals Arise from Awards of Various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a batch of 23 Miscellaneous First Appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, filed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against MACT Order Exonerating Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim. Insurance Company Held Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Driver Lacking Licence, Following Swaran Singh Precedent.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased appellant's legal representatives challenged the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A, Corrects Multiplier Error. No Fault Liability Provision Does Not Require Proof of Negligence; Multiplier Must Be Based on Victim's Age.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the mother of a 28-year-old deceased who was a pillion rider. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Tribunal's Award for Injuries Sustained in Hit-and-Run Accident. Delay in Filing FIR Does Not Discredit Claim When Medical Evidence and Other Circumstances Corroborate the Accident.

The appeal was filed by the insurer, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging the judgment and award dated 05.07.2012 passed by the Addl. Senior C...