Search Results for "IPC 495"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Uncle for Murder of Infant in Property Dispute. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for snatching and dashing 1.5-year-old child on cement floor, causing fatal head injury.

The appellant, Mukund Digambar Dixit, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of his 1.5-year-old nephew. The in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Special Court in Ghaziabad Lacked Jurisdiction as Money-Laundering Offence Allegedly Committed in Maharashtra, Under Section 44(1) of Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, Anti-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Accused in Rape and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 376 IPC sustained as witness testimonies were trustworthy and chain of circumstances was complete, applying last seen theory and Section 106 Evidence Act.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal by an accused convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the rape and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in Robbery Case — FIR Discloses Prima Facie Offences Under Sections 394, 336, 506 IPC. Counterblast Allegation Insufficient to Quash FIR When Specific Overt Acts Are Alleged.

The applicants, Chatrabhuj Dadarao Shinde and Shivaji Chatrabhuj Shinde, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Attempt to Murder in Family Property Dispute — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 307 IPC. Allegations of poisoning and assault found to be exaggerated and unsupported by medical evidence, leading to quashing of criminal proceedings.

The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 158/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Dowry Case Due to Compromise Between Spouses and Family Members. Court Holds That Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Can Be Invoked to Quash Non-Compoundable Offences When Settlement Is Genuine and Continuation Would Be an Abuse of Process.

The petitioners, nine family members, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code ...