Search Results for "Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Modifies Preliminary Decree in Partition Suit, Applies Vineetha Sharma Principles Under Hindu Succession Act. Daughter Entitled to 1/9 Share as Coparcener Under Central Act 39 of 2005, Irrespective of Father's Death Before 2005 and Regardless of Date of Marriage.

The judgment arises from a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the preliminary decree dated 25.02.2016 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Daughters Cannot Claim Share in Coparcenary Property Allotted to Father Before 20th December 2004. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is prospective and does not affect partitions effected prior to the amendment.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholds Daughters' Right to Equal Share in Joint Family Property. The court held that daughters are coparceners under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the suit for partition is not barred by limitation.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals filed against the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2016 in O.S.No.173/2011 passed by the Principal Senior C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Plaintiff's 1/9th Share Upheld. Son from First Wife Entitled to Share in Father's Intestate Property Despite Prior Partition Between Father and Sons from Second Wife.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) challenging the judgment and decree of the subordinate courts which gr...