Search Results for "Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Appeal in HR & CE Promotion Case — Considers Governing Principles on Promotion. Promotion Is Not a Right but Consideration Is Fundamental, and Filling Up Posts Is Administrative Prerogative; Panel Inclusion Gives No Right.

Background: The writ appeal arose from an order dated 24.01.2025 passed by a single judge in W.P.No.14422 of 2016, which was filed by the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Under HR&CE Act Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Statutory Appeal Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Renders Writ Petition Not Maintainable.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a registered society representing Thriswathanthirargal (Sthalathars) cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Declaring Licence Fees Ultra Vires under U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. Imposition of Rs. 30/- and Rs. 51/- Licence Fees on Rickshaw Owners and Drivers Lacked Sufficient Quid Pro Quo, Rendering Bye-Laws Invalid.

The dispute arose from bye-laws framed by the Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi (Municipal Board) under the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, imposing annual li...