Search Results for "Grampanchayat Resolution"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Sarpanch Disqualified for Taking Illegal Commercial Water Connection Without Sanction.

The petitioner, Ramdas Dattaraya Khose, was an elected member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Padalidariya. Respondents 7 to 9 filed an application und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Permission to Open New Law College Under Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016. State Government's Discretion Under Section 109(3)(d) Upheld as Absolute; Annual Plan Need Not Be Strictly Within Perspective Plan.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging a Government Resolution dated 15.06.2023 granting permission to respondent No.4 to open...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Sand Ghat Allotments in Re-auction Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. The court held that cancellation of allotment without notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, five proprietors of firms, were allotted sand ghats through an auction process. However, the respondents issued a re-auction notice o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Third Extension of APMC Board in Solapur — Holds Successive Extensions Without Election Unlawful Under Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The court directed the Collector to hold elections within four months, failing which an Administrator must be appointed.

The petitioners, claiming to be members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Karmala, challenged an order dated 19 April 2012 passed b...