Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund Scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund Scheme"

450 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 450 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Employees' Association's Petition for Option Under Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Retirees who had already accepted benefits under one option cannot later claim benefits under another option of the same scheme.

30 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Mumbai Port Trust Retired Employees' Association and two individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents (U...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction to Accept Late Pension Option in Exceptional Circumstances. Bank's Appeal Dismissed as Court Finds Employee's Lack of Knowledge Due to Being Abroad Justifies Condonation of Delay.

1 Oct 2019

The respondent, Janak Raj Sharma, was a Senior Manager at Oriental Bank of Commerce who took voluntary retirement on 15.01.2001. On 23.08.2010, the Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Employees' Provident Funds Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Software Consultancy Services Not Covered Under Notification Dated 17th May 1971 Issued Under Section 1(3)(b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer Appeals in Provident Fund Damages Case — Upholds Levy of Damages Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for Delayed Remittance. Mens Rea Not Essential for Levy of Damages Under Section 14B; Authority Has Discretion to Quantify Damages Based on Circumstances.

24 Jan 2013

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by several companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and othe...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeal by Successful Resolution Applicant Against EPFO Claim for Pre-CIRP Dues, Holding That Resolution Plan Approved Under IBC Is Binding on All Stakeholders Including Statutory Authorities. The tribunal ruled that EPFO's failure to file claim during CIRP results in extinguishment of dues, and the corporate debtor gets a clean slate post-resolution.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two appeals arising from an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, dated 03.07.2024, which allowed an appl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Damages Order in Provident Fund Case Due to Inordinate Delay — 19-Year Delay in Initiating Section 14-B Proceedings Held Unreasonable and Unjustified. The court held that the authority under Section 14-B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 must consider the delay in initiating proceedings before levying damages, and failure to do so vitiates the order.

17 Jun 2005

The petitioner, M/s. K.K. Nag Limited, an employer covered under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (PF Act) with e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Against Section 7A EPF Order, Holds Remedy of Appeal Under Section 7-I Not Barred by Rejection of Review Under Section 7B. The court interpreted Section 7B(5) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to mean that only the decision rejecting review is non-appealable, but the original Section 7A order remains appealable under Section 7-I.

29 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Zensar Technologies Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 31 May 20...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Against Reduction of Damages; Upholds Tribunal's Appellate Power to Modify Quantum. The Court held that the Tribunal under Section 7L of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 has power to reduce damages imposed under Section 14B, and the parallel power of the Central Board under Paragraph 32B of the Scheme does not exclude the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

15 Dec 2010

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposed damages on the respondent employer for delayed contribution of provident fund dues for various period...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Retired Employees in Pension Scheme Dispute, Upholding State's Authority to Repeal Welfare Measure with Cut-off Date. Denial of Pensionary Benefits Under Himachal Pradesh Corporate Sector Employees Scheme, 1999, After Repeal on 02.12.2004, is Valid as It Does Not Alter Accrued Rights Under Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1995.

16 Apr 2025

The dispute involved three retired officers of the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation Limited, a state-owned entity, who filed a pe...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)