Search Results for "Developer Termination"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Developer. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled, No Enforceable Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The plaintiffs, a group of 52 individuals, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement for sale of flats in a building to be constru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Order in Execution Proceedings. Judgment Debtor's Application Under Section 151 CPC for Recalling Order Dated 10.07.2024 Was Rightly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s Pushpam Realty, a partnership firm, is the judgment debtor in Execution No.1075/2020 pending before the III Additional City Civil ...