Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

317 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 317 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Irrevocable Consents by Occupants Upheld. Court holds that once occupants have given unconditional irrevocable consents for redevelopment, they cannot subsequently withdraw or revoke them, and the High Power Committee's approval based on such consents is valid.

14 Jun 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the proposed redevelopment of a plot of land admeasuring 3297.68...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Order in Execution Proceedings. Judgment Debtor's Application Under Section 151 CPC for Recalling Order Dated 10.07.2024 Was Rightly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s Pushpam Realty, a partnership firm, is the judgment debtor in Execution No.1075/2020 pending before the III Additional City Civil ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule in Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation's Absorption of Builder's Employees. The Court entertained the challenge under Article 226 to Resolution No. 25 and order dated 27.06.2007 absorbing 69 persons, directing final hearing forthwith.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioners, 69 unemployed youths from Thane district, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Judica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenants Against Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Dispute — Held That Tenants Cannot Be Evicted Without Proper Rehabilitation Under MHADA and Cooperative Housing Society Bye-Laws.

2 Sep 2016

The judgment pertains to a group of appeals filed by tenants (Pramod Jamnadas Gokani, Upendra Lallubhai Shah, Priti Pramod Gokani, and Kamlesh Jayant ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Redevelopment Dispute — Balance of Convenience Favors Society and Developer Over Individual Members. The court set aside the injunction restraining the society from alienating the suit flat, holding that the project was near completion and the members had not shown irreparable injury.

14 Oct 2019

The appeal arises from an ad-interim order passed by the Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai, which restrained the appellant, Goregaon Pearl C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Over Development Agreements — Arbitration Clause Binding on Non-Signatory Transferee. The court held that a non-signatory who claims through or under a signatory to an arbitration agreement is bound by the arbitration clause, and appointed a retired judge as sole arbitrator.

30 Sep 2014

The judgment concerns two related matters: a Notice of Motion (No. 540 of 2013) in Suit No. 62 of 2013 and an Arbitration Application (No. 86 of 2013)...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Notice of Motion in Flat Allotment Dispute — Consideration of Interim Relief for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction Sought by Original Allottee’s Transferee. The court examines validity of termination of allotment by builder where original allottee alleged fraud in transfer, and subsequent sales to third parties.

4 Jun 2014

The present dispute arose out of a flat in the Oberoi Splendor project at Andheri, Mumbai. The plaintiff, a practising advocate, filed a suit seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Receiver Appointment Plea in Redevelopment Dispute — Oral Contract Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act. Court holds that an oral agreement for redevelopment of a co-operative housing society, even if evidenced by resolutions, is not specifically enforceable under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and that appointment of a receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not warranted when the plaintiff has no legal right to possession.

12 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Mangal Milan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking specific performance of an oral contract for redevelopment of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

27 Jun 2013

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Lease Dispute Between Society Member and Municipal Corporation. Arbitration Clause in Lease Agreement Not Binding on Member Who is Not a Party to the Agreement.

9 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Shree Kishore Jaiprakash Agarwal, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)