Search Results for "Debt Recovery Tribunal"

675 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 675 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the arbitrator's findings.

The petitioner, Rajuram Sawaji Purohit, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to set a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Application Under Section 482 CrPC and Discharges Accused in Cheating Case. Lease Agreement Dispute Lacks Dishonest Intention Required for Section 420 IPC.

The applicant, Deepak Jaiswal, a director of M/s D.J. Enterprises Ltd., filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — NCLT Cannot Dismiss Petition Without Applying Mind to Merits. Adjudicating Authority Must Determine Default and Admit or Reject Petition Under Section 7, Not Direct Settlement Without Considering Individual Claims.

The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Corporate Debtor Against Banks in SARFAESI Act Proceedings — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act as Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Exists.

The appellant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had availed various credit facilities from a consortiu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Deduction of Mortgage Repayment Under Section 48(i). The court held that repayment of mortgage debt is an expenditure incurred in connection with transfer of mortgaged asset, allowable under Section 48(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The judgment involves two tax appeals, one by the revenue and one by the assessee, arising from a common issue regarding the allowability of mortgage ...