Search Results for "DRT Procedure Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "DRT Procedure Rules"

151 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeals Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings. The Commission set aside the common order dated 11.09.2024 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of execution applications under Sections 25 and 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Aug 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard appeals (AE No. 73/2024 and AE No. 74/2024) filed by the complainant/decree holder, ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Execution Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Flat Possession — Directions Issued for Compliance Under Sections 25 and 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decree holder is entitled to pursue both execution remedies simultaneously without being compelled to elect between them.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves execution appeals filed by the decree holder, Kishore Bhardwaj, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 of the State Consumer Disput...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings — Compliance of Decree for Possession or Refund with Interest. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the execution applications for fresh adjudication, keeping all contentions open.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves an appeal by Kishore Bhardwaj, the complainant/decree holder, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 passed by the State Consumer D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assignee's Challenge to Auction Sale for Non-Compliance with Regulation 37(1) of DRT Regulations, 2015 — Failure to Raise Objection at Appropriate Stage and Lack of Prejudice Renders Challenge Belated and Unsubstantiated.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Invest Assets Securitisations & Reconstruction Private Limited, an assignee holding a pari passu charge with the first respondent Bank...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case, Restoring Interim Order for Sale of Mortgaged Property. The Court held that the interim order directing steps for sale without final orders was warranted to protect the secured creditor's rights under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as the respondent had defaulted on credit facilities.

18 Apr 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute between Punjab & Sind Bank (appellant) and M/s Frontline Corporation Ltd. (respondent) concerning the sale of mortgage...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Personal Guarantor to Travel Abroad for Sister-in-Law's Marriage, Holds Right to Travel Abroad Part of Personal Liberty Under Article 21 of Constitution of India. The court set aside Debt Recovery Tribunal's order refusing travel permission, finding it arbitrary and violative of Article 21.

7 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Anurag Gupta, a personal guarantor of a company under liquidation, challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) refusing hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against SARFAESI Sale Notice, Directs Petitioners to Approach DRT for Interim Relief. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality in the sale notice under Section 32 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and the remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available and efficacious.

30 Jul 2021

The petitioners, Smt. Aruna DTS Moorthy and M/s AMGC Logistic Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Police to Provide Aid for Taking Possession Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. Bank's Application Allowed as Police Failed to Assist Court Commissioner Despite Magistrate's Order.

22 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Corporation Bank, had advanced loan facilities to M/s. Ankur Iron India Private Limited, which defaulted in repayment. The Bank initia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Guarantor's Petition in RDB Act Execution Case — Notice Under Section 31A Mandatory. Failure to Serve Notice on Judgment Debtors Before Issuing Recovery Certificate Violates Natural Justice and Section 31A of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

14 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Sudhakar Borkar, was a guarantor to a loan taken by respondent No.5 (M/s R & S Enterprises) from respondent No.1 (State Bank of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment Before Judgment in Recovery Suit by Financial Institutions. Non-Compliance With Order 38 Rule 5A CPC Does Not Invalidate Order Absent Prejudice.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal arises from a suit filed by financial institutions (respondents 2 to 12) against J.K. Synthetics Limited (appellant) for recovery of dues. ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)