Search Results for "DRC"

95 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission's Compensation Award Against Builder for Delayed Possession in Housing Project. Builder's 'Endeavour' Clause Interpreted as Requiring Reasonable Efforts, and Contractual Compensation Rate Held Unfair Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The dispute arose from a delayed housing project where the builder, NBCC (India) Limited, failed to hand over possession of a residential unit to the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeal in Part, Reducing Interest Rate on Refund for Delayed Possession of Row House. Buyer's Agreement's One-Sided Clause on Delay Interest Does Not Preclude Claim for Reasonable Compensation; Refund Upheld but Interest Reduced from 12% to 9%.

The case involves a dispute between Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd (the developer/appellant) and Devasis Rudra (the buyer/respondent) arising...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Interest Rate to 9% in Consumer Disputes Against Developer for Delayed Possession. The Court upheld deficiency in service but reduced interest from 15% to 9% per annum, following earlier precedent in Himanshu Arora case.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from consumer complaints against DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. regarding its residential proje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order Exonerating Hospital and Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — No Negligence Found in Treatment and Discharge of Cancer Patient. Bolam Test Applied: Doctor Not Negligent If Acting in Accordance with Practice Accepted by a Reasonable Body of Medical Men.

The appellant, Vinod Jain, filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital and Dr. R.K. Bhandari a...