Search Results for "Consumer Court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Consumer Court"

1577 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1577 result(s)

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Execution Appeals Against Builder for Non-Compliance of Consent Order. Builder Failed to Deliver Possession and Pay Compensation as Per Settlement, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

10 Jun 2025

The present appeals arise out of two execution applications filed by the complainants, Shivani Aggarwal and Sunita Jain, against the builder, Pranav A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules HUDA v. Sunita, Holds Statutory Bodies Amenable to Consumer Protection Act for Services Rendered for Consideration. The Court ruled that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 applies to statutory authorities providing services for consideration, and sovereign functions are exempt only if strictly understood.

16 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference arising from an order dated 13.07.2018, where a two-judge Bench doubted the correctness of HUDA v. Sunita (20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Case — Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 Not Applicable to Pre-2003 Dues. The Court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not apply to arrears that accrued before the Act came into force, as the Act is not retrospective.

4 Nov 2024

The case involves a dispute between the Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited (appellant), a state electricity distribution util...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Defective Machinery. Claim Barred by Limitation as Arbitration Reference Made Beyond Three Years from Cause of Action Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

11 Oct 2010

The appellant, M/s. Premlaxmi & Co., placed an order with respondent No.1, Ingersoll Rand (India) Limited, for purchase of portable compressors. Four ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeals by Builder Against Execution Orders in Consumer Complaints — Upholds State Commission's Directions for Compliance with Settlement Terms.

30 Nov -0001

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard a batch of appeals filed by M/s. Samar Estates Private Limited and its directors aga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court Judgment Dismissing Challenge to Arbitral Award in Bill Discounting Dispute — Contractual Interest Rate of 36% Per Annum with Monthly Rests Upheld. High Court's Upholding of Arbitral Award on Interest Rate Based on Mutual Agreement Between Commercial Parties and Not Opposed to Public Policy.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a bill discounting facility extended by the respondent to a seller (BDDL) and buyer (appellant) of goods. The appellant and BDD...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Dec 2021

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

High Court

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015

9 Feb 2016

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)