Search Results for "Compulsory Acquisition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Compulsory Acquisition"

529 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioners Against Union of India and NHAI -- Challenge to Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 Fails -- Section 94 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable

24 Feb 2026

The petitioners, owners of galas in Godown L1, challenged NHAI's acquisition of part of the godown for the Vadodara Mumbai Expressway under the Nation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Resettlement Act — Acquisition Upheld as Possession Vested in Government and Section 48(1) Application Rejected. Court Held That Once Possession Is Taken and Award Is Passed, Government Cannot Withdraw Land From Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Ashok Shantinath Chougule, as legal heir of his deceased father Shantinath Dada Chougule, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Unauthorized Possession of Land by NHAI — Failure to Acquire Additional Area Despite Taking Possession Violates Article 300A of Constitution. The court held that the respondents cannot retain possession of the additional 8350 sq.mtrs without paying compensation and directed them to pay compensation for use and occupation and to initiate acquisition proceedings under the National Highways Act, 1956.

7 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Tushar Laxman Bhakare @ Chawhan and Baby Laxman Bhakare @ Chawhan, are owners of land admeasuring 3 Ha-39 Ares from Gat No.402 situat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Fixed-Term Employees Challenging Termination Upon Expiry of Contract — No Right to Continue After Expiry of Fixed Term. Fixed-term contractual employees have no vested right to continue beyond the contract period, and termination upon expiry does not attract principles of natural justice.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 23 individuals, were appointed on fixed-term contractual basis by the respondent authorities for a specific period. Upon expiry of th...

High Court

High Court Rejects Remand Request in Land Acquisition Enhancement Appeal — Acquiring Body's Failure to File Written Statement After Being Allowed to Participate Does Not Warrant Remand. The Court Relied on the Principle That Mere Technicalities Cannot Defeat the Ends of Justice When the Party Had Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses.

2 Feb 2016

The first appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by the acquiring body, Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

2 Jan 2025

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Application for Leave to Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Acquiring Body Not a Necessary Party Under Section 18 Reference Proceedings. The court held that the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, not being a party to the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, has no locus standi to seek leave to appeal against the award enhancing compensation.

27 Oct 2016

The Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) filed two civil applications seeking leave to appeal against awards passed by the reference Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases for Airport Expansion — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Interfere with KIADB Acquisition. Landowners' challenge to acquisition for Hubli Airport expansion fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

28 Mar 2013

The case involves four writ appeals filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)