Search Results for "BDA Act, 1976"

116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 Not Lapsed Despite Non-Completion of Scheme. Possession Taken and Award Passed, No Abandonment or Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

The appellant, Sri M. Rajappa, filed a writ appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging an order dated 16.12.2024 passed by a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner Who Purchased Land After Notification Has No Locus to Challenge Acquisition Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Basavaraj Bhimappa Illiger, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court, Dhar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Apartment Construction in Residential Zone. Petitioners failed to prove zoning violation or need for environmental clearance; BBMP's approval upheld.

The petitioners, Sri. V. Dhamodaran and others, residents of Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of an apart...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Private Complaint Against Former Chief Minister for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Sanction for prosecution of public servants is mandatory and absence of valid sanction renders complaint not maintainable.

The petitioner, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, sought quashing of a private complaint filed by the respondent before the XXIII Additional City ...