Search Results for "Authorized Person"

3647 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3647 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Goods in Trademark Dispute, Directs Customs to Not Withhold Clearance Based on Pending Civil Suit. Customs Authorities Cannot Refuse Clearance Solely Due to Private Trademark Dispute; Remedy Lies in Civil Court Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioners, UPS Sales and Suzhou Dake Machinery Company Ltd., imported goods under Bill of Lading No. EXSH2310608. The customs authorities (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes MMDR Act Proceedings Initiated by Police in Multiple Petitions; Police Not Authorized Under Section 22 of MMDR Act. Cognizance of Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Cannot Be Taken on Police Report—Only Authorized Persons Can File Complaint.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petitioner’s Appeal Reinstated as Dismissal Grounds Found Invalid; Directions Issued for De Novo Consideration. High Court quashes Appellate Authority's dismissal due to procedural irregularities and remands for reconsideration.

The High Court quashed the impugned order dismissing the Petitioner’s appeal due to alleged non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements and lack of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Mining Case Due to Lack of Authorized Complaint Under MMDR Act. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Lokayukta Not Authorized Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 to Lodge Complaint.

The petitioners, three individuals aged between 70 and 80 years, residents of Waddalur village, Raichur, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Wildlife Case Due to Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Police Constable Not a Competent Officer to Lodge Complaint Under Sections 9, 39, 50, 51 of the Act.

The petitioners, Mannu Kaduba Gavane and Sagar Mannu Gavane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Electricity Distribution Company in Theft Case: Parallel Assessment Under Section 126 Permissible Despite Criminal Complaint Under Section 135. Assessment Under Section 126 Not Conditional on Consumer Seeking Restoration of Supply.

The case involves an appeal by West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which allowed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Offences Under MMDR Act and IPC. Prosecution Under MMDR Act Requires Complaint by Authorized Officer; Police FIR Without Authority is Illegal.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows HUDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Section 5A Compliance Upheld. Collector's recommendation not binding on State Government; no discrimination found in acquisition of land for development.

The case involves appeals by Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) against the High Court's judgment quashing land acquisition notifications unde...