High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Articles 341 and 342"
138 result(s) found
Found 138 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.
17 Feb 2025The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...
- 82
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Internal Reservation for Backward Classes in Tamil Nadu - The Court reversed the High Court's declaration of unconstitutionality, holding that sub-classification within Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities is permissible under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution of India, 1950, based on commission recommendations and historical data.
31 Mar 2022The dispute arose from the Tamil Nadu Special Reservation of seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of appoi...
- 904
High Court
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenges to Cancellation of Non-Creamy Layer Certificates. Petitioners Contend Income from Salary of Group C Employees Should Be Excluded Under Office Memoranda of Central Government.
3 Oct 2016The matter concerned two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders withdrawing Non-Creamy Layer certifica...
- 22
High Court
- 65
High Court
- 29
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate for 'Mana' Caste — Committee Failed to Consider Consistent Documentary Evidence and Prior Validity Certificates of Blood Relatives.
8 Nov 2017The petitioner, Gajanan s/o Pandurang Shende, challenged the order dated 23-2-2013 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Gadch...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.
17 Feb 2025The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...
- 1878
