Search Results for "Article 31A"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Inordinate Delay of 4828 Days Not Condoned: Landmark Ruling on Limitation Act in Land Acquisition Cases”

The appellants (landowners) filed an appeal seeking enhancement of compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act. However, the appeal was filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Liquidator's Appeal, Upholds Forfeiture of EMD and PDM for Default by Successful Bidder in Liquidation Sale. Writ Petitioner's Failure to Pay Balance Sale Consideration Within Stipulated Time Justified Forfeiture Under IBC Regulations.

The appellant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, Liquidator of M/s Samrudhi Realty Ltd., appealed against an order dated 12.12.2024 passed by a learned Single Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging TDS Provisions — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 194C, 194J, and 206AA of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the provisions are not arbitrary or discriminatory and that TRACES is a valid administrative mechanism.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by various assessees, including individuals and companies, challenging the constitutional validity of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Closure Order in Pollution Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Environmental Officer's Order Set Aside for Lack of Opportunity of Hearing Under Water and Air Pollution Acts.

The petitioner, M/s. Devi Enterprises, represented by its proprietrix Smt. Sukadi Devi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...