Search Results for "Arnesh Kumar"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash Matrimonial Cruelty and Dowry Case. Husband Challenges Criminal Proceedings Alleging Vague Allegations and Abuse of Process.

The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending in C.C.No.19072/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Section 498A IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Compromise reached between husband and wife leads to quashing of FIR and all proceedings in C.C.No.15166/2020.

The petitioners, who are the husband (accused No.1), mother-in-law (accused No.2), and father-in-law (accused No.3), filed a criminal petition under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Alleged Caste-Based Insult Not in Public View. Court holds that Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 requires insult to be in public view, and private conversation does not attract the provision.

The present appeal was filed by three appellants, namely Gayatri Sanjay Jaitmal, Baburao Rahuba Sonawane, and Padmabai Baburao Sonawane, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in MMRD Act and IPC Case — Custodial Investigation Not Required. Offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC do not necessitate custodial interrogation; anticipatory bail granted with conditions.

The petitioner, Iranna S/o Mallappa Baliger, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking antici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Vague Allegations. FIR and Charge-Sheet Lacked Specific Instances of Dowry Demand or Cruelty Under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who are the husband (petitioner no.1) and his parents (petitioners 2 and 3), filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Vague Allegations. Lack of Specific Overt Acts Against Mother-in-Law and Sister-in-Law Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners, being the mother-in-law (petitioner no.2) and sister-in-law (petitioner no.3) of the respondent no.2 (complainant), sought quashing o...