Search Results for "tenancy right"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "tenancy right"

1821 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1821 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Possession of the Acquired Land Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by Fakhruddin s/o Hyderali (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Mustafa Fakhruddin Ambawala) challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Foreign Bank's Surrender of Licence Does Not Affect Pending Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal is determined at the time of filing the application and subsequent cessation of banking business does not oust its jurisdiction under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

23 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Isibars Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had availed credit facilities from Commerzbank AG, a German ban...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Application for Decree of Possession Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC — No Clear Admission Found in Society's Letters. The court held that letters from the defendant society did not amount to unequivocal admissions of the plaintiff's ownership, and thus summary decree was not warranted.

5 Feb 2019

The plaintiff, Mahesh B. Chaudhary, filed a suit seeking possession of Flat No.17, 1st floor, Radha Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., and a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's title as sole heir was established and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

30 Nov -0001

The second appeal arose from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) agai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Occupancy Rights in Inam Land of Temple. Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights Was Without Jurisdiction as Land Was Exempt Under Section 132 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

19 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Sri S.S. Kumaraswamy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

10 Dec 2019

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

10 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Lower Courts' Rejection of Exemption Pleading Challenge in Eviction Case — Statutory Exemption from Rent Control Order Does Not Require Pleading. Successor-in-interest of Janpad Sabha Need Not Plead Statutory Exemption Under Notification Dated 26.7.1949 As It Is A Matter Of Law.

23 Dec 2011

The Zilla Parishad, Nagpur, as the owner of a plot admeasuring 100 ft x 100 ft in the compound of the former Janpad Sabha, filed a suit for eviction a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Commercial Redevelopment Over Tenant's Objection — Tenant Cannot Dictate Nature of Redevelopment Under DCPR 2034 Regulation 33(19). The court held that a tenant's insistence on residential redevelopment after demolition of a dilapidated building is not sustainable, and the landlord is entitled to redevelop as per permissible rules.

29 Mar 2023

The petitioner, G M Heights LLP, is the owner of land in Bandra, Mumbai, which previously had a building with 21 tenants, some commercial and some res...

87 88 89 90 91

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)