Search Results for "lease purpose"

2647 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2647 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal in Property Tax Assessment Dispute — Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Does Not Entitle Exemption from Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The appeal was filed by Akruti Nirman Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, Shri Vyomesh M. Shah, challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judge o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST Detention Order — Petitioner Failed to Produce E-Way Bill or Invoice at Time of Inspection, Detention Upheld Under Section 129 of MGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Velentine Properties Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the detention of its goods and vehicle by the State of Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue Expenditure Classification for Technical Consultancy and Labour Housing in Income Tax Reference. Payments for feasibility studies and labour welfare held deductible as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue department. The assessee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order to Auction Civic Amenity Plot in Gokak. Deputy Commissioner lacks authority under Section 72 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 to auction a site reserved for civic amenity in a private layout.

The petitioner, Mohan Vasudev Chavan, owned land bearing Survey No.134/1 in Gokak, which he converted to non-agricultural use and formed a layout of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Tenant in Land Reforms Case. The Court held that the Land Tribunal's finding of tenancy based on evidence cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.

The appellant, Sri Admar Mutt, represented by its manager, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court date...