Search Results for "initial appointment date"

1592 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1592 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petition Against Pensionary Benefits for Daily Wagers Made Permanent. Past Daily Wage Service Counts as Qualifying Service for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Chief Executive Officer of Vita Nagar Parishad, a local authority, challenging the orders of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Against Housing Society and Flat Owners for Lack of Arbitrable Dispute. Dispute over alleged oral agreement for redevelopment of building not covered by arbitration clause in share certificate.

The petitioner, M/s Heritage Lifestyle & Developers Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Judicial Officers in Constitutional Writ Seeking Elevation to High Court Bench. Ad-hoc Service as Fast Track Court Judges Does Not Qualify as Judicial Service Under Article 217(2)(a) of Constitution for Elevation Purposes, Following Precedent in Kum C. Yamini Case.

The petitioners, members of the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service, approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking relie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Counting Probationary Service as Qualifying Service for Pension — State Bank of India Employee's Probation Period Counts Towards Pensionable Service Under SBI Pension Rules.

The petitioner, Mrs. Sameedha Suhas Deshpande, was appointed as a Cashier-cum-Clerk in the State Bank of India (SBI) on 23rd October 1985, subject to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in ATM Cash Replenishment Dispute. The petition challenges the award of Rs. 23.26 crores to the respondent for cash loading discrepancies under the 2010 and 2015 agreements.

The judgment originates from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Securitrans India Private Limited, see...