Search Results for "executive notification"

2563 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2563 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal Reducing Land Acquisition Compensation from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 per Acre for Lack of Evidence. Claimants failed to prove market value through sale instances or other evidence under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Executive Engineer, Medium Project Division, Latur, against the judgment of the Reference Court enhancing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners' Challenge to Section 6(1) Notification Fails Due to Delay, Laches, and Existence of Alternative Remedy.

The petitioners, who are residents and agriculturists of Mahalunge, Taluka-Mulshi, District Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge by Drug Supplier Against Blacklisting Order Alleging Non-Compliance with Rule 26A of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000. Petitioner Assails Blacklisting as Ultra Vires in Absence of Corrupt Practice Finding and Procedural Violation.

The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Denial of Admission to Medical College Under SC Quota to Son of Resident Government Servant on Ground of Parental Migration Violates Rights. Issue Pertains to Interpretation of UT Reservation Policy Clause on Migration.

The petitioners, a father and son, approached the High Court of Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of a writ petition challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Validity of Ahmedpur Development Plan Notification Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Core Issue Involves Mandatory or Directory Nature of Section 26(1) Timeline and Permissible Limits of Extension Under Third Proviso.

The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners in Ahmedpur, District Latur, challenging a notification dated 29.03.2012 published on 08.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...