Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1794 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1794 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Contract Labourers. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor Deployment Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Uni Klinger Ltd., challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar dated 28.08.2003, which allowed complaints filed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order That Tenants Cannot Purchase Trust Lands Under BT & AL Act. Property Registered as Public Trust Exempts It from Statutory Purchase Provisions Under Section 88B of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The dispute concerned agricultural lands in Sangli district that were originally Deosthan Inam lands. The tenant claimed right to purchase under the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition Challenging Remand Order by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Dispute. Finality Clause under Section 73 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Does Not Bar Revision Jurisdiction of Tribunal When Possession Issue Remains Unresolved.

The petitioners, landlords, were aggrieved by an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 31 July 1991 in Revision Application No. MRT.P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act Set Aside as Suit Land Not Trust Property on 1.4.1957.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 10.8.1998 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Ownership Acquired After 31 December 1958 Does Not Entitle Landholder to Seek Possession Under Section 44 of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.

This writ petition arose from a tenancy dispute under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The petitioner, Subhash Bagal, claimed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Rent Default. Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Over a Decade, No Dispute as to Standard Rent or Permitted Increases, Case Falls Under Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act.

The dispute pertains to a suit for eviction filed by the landlady, Mrs. Kusum Pandurang Keni, against the tenant, Sudhir Kumar Sengupta (since decease...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Wheeling and Transmission Charges Not Rent Under Section 194I. Payments for Use of Transmission Lines Held Not Rent as No Transfer of Possession or Right to Use Occurs.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that whee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Certificate Under Section 63AA of Gujarat Tenancy Act for Industrial Use of Agricultural Land. Rejection of Application on Ground of Prior Non-Agricultural Use Held Invalid as Section 63AA Does Not Prohibit Such Conversion for Bona Fide Industrial Purpose.

The petitioner, Mewad Polymers Private Limited, purchased agricultural land situated at Revenue Survey No.70, Village-Fazalpur (Ankhi), Taluka & Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Injunction in Tenancy Suit — Court Holds That Small Causes Court Must Consider Prima Facie Case for Injunction Without Deciding Tenancy at Interim Stage

The petitioners, Hansa Bhaskar Dave and Rajesh Bhaskar Dave, filed a suit (R.A.D. Suit No. 1094 of 2011) in the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, seeking a ...