Search Results for "Technical error"

2275 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2275 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Dispute Over School Construction — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding possession and title of agricultural land cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) challenging the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Land Ceiling Case for Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Revision Application under Section 89A of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 held time-barred and without proper notice.

The petitioner, M/S Anchor Daewoo Industries Ltd, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Essential Commodities Act Confiscation Case — Reduction of Confiscation from 50% to 15% Upheld. Appellate court's proportionate reduction of confiscation under Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, not interfered with in revisional jurisdiction.

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Maintained Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Established Under Section 34 IPC as Both Accused Participated in Assault with Shared Intent.

The appellants, Dattu Rama Theurkar and Deepak Dattu Theurkar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, in Sessions Case No.23 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition of Ad-hoc Employee Seeking Regularisation — Appointment Not Through Proper Selection Process. Petitioner Appointed on Ad-hoc Basis as Showroom Assistant in 1997 Cannot Claim Regularisation as a Matter of Right.

The petitioner, Smt. D. Uma, was appointed on an ad-hoc basis on 10.03.1997 as a Showroom Assistant in the Office of the Regional Design and Technical...