Search Results for "SAT"

1155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 354 IPC for outraging modesty of an 8-year-old girl set aside as prosecution failed to prove case beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Hemant Tukaram Karande, a retired Station Director of Akashwani, challenging his conviction under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter Due to Failure to Frame Preliminary Issues in Disciplinary Enquiry. Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Pralhad Waman Lahane, was employed as a Banking Inspector at the Jalna District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. He joined as a Clerk on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempted Murder and Burglary Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307, 457, 380, 511 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Muka Biren Rathod, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 307, 457, 380, and 511 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policeman in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, a policeman attached to the Highway Security Squad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider vital documents and exhibited casual approach.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Siraz Mohammed Sayyed, challenged a detention order dated 10 July 2015 passed under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PF Commissioner's Claim for Interest Under Section 7Q Up to Winding Up Date in Company Liquidation. Priority Under Section 11(2) of PF Act Extends to All Dues Including Interest, But Damages Under Section 14B Must Be Levied Prior to Winding Up.

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Thane, filed a Company Application challenging the adjudication order of the Official Liquidator of M/s. Zod...