Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1724 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1724 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutionality of Section 7 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The Petitions Allege That Ex-Officio Members Cannot Vote in BBMP Elections for Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Standing Committees as It Violates Article 243R of the Constitution.

27 Nov 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging the constitutional validity of Section 7 of the Karnat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutionality of Voting Rights of Ex-Officio Members in Municipal Elections Under Section 7 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The petitions sought declarations that enabling Members of Parliament and State Legislature to vote in elections for Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Standing Committees violates Article 243R of the Constitution and is unconstitutional.

27 Nov 2015

The batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on 27th November 2015, presided over by Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge Against Denial of Pension to Assistant Teacher Who Resigned After Nearly 20 Years. Resignation Under Rule 40 of MEPS Rules Forfeited Past Service, and Claim Barred by 30-Year Delay and Ineligibility for Voluntary Retirement Under Rule 66 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

29 Jul 2022

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed by the legal heirs of Bhagwanrao Anantrao Chate, a former assistant teacher in a private school, challen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

14 Sep 2021

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Conversion Date in Execution of Foreign Currency Decrees Under Section 44-A CPC. Relevant Date for Conversion Held to Be Date of Foreign Decree, Not Date of Enforceability After Removal of Stay.

21 Dec 2013

The appeals arose from execution proceedings to enforce foreign costs decrees obtained by the respondents (Ananda Bazar Patrika Limited and Aveek Sark...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Account Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Limitation Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963. Exchange of Correspondence Cannot Extend Limitation Once Right to Sue Accrues.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd., filed a civil suit in 2005 against the Central Bank of India and another respondent seeking a decree ...

High Court

(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4168 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rajasthan High Court's Decision to Fix Minimum Cut-Off Marks After Examination in Translator Recruitment. Fixing 75% Cut-Off After Examination Held Impermissible as It Alters Selection Procedure Mid-Process Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

7 Nov 2024

The case arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Rajasthan High Court in 2009 for 13 posts of Translators. The applicable rules, as amended ...

87 88 89 90 91

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)