Search Results for "Distinct offences"

1211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 306 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment soon before death.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of three appellants (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) for offences under Sections 306 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Loan Default by Cooperative Bank Borrower Does Not Attract Criminal Offences Under Sections 406, 420 IPC When Transaction is Commercial and No Deception at Inception.

The petitioner, Niranjan s/o Shripatrao Jadhav, was named as accused No.1 in Crime No.I-47/11 registered on 4.5.2011 with Bidkin Police Station, Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Production of Document in Criminal Complaint. Court holds that the document sought was not relevant to the proceedings and the application was filed belatedly.

The petitioner, Manjula Ramlal Barot, filed a criminal complaint against respondents No.1 to 5 for offences under Sections 347, 348, 386, 395, 506(ii)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Separation of Trial for Accused in Criminal Case Due to Non-Cooperation of Other Accused. Petitioner's Application for Separate Trial Rejected by Magistrate Despite Prosecution's No Objection; High Court Sets Aside Order and Directs Speedy Trial.

The petitioner, Shaikh Shakil, was one of 14 accused in R.C.C. No. 93/2008 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Udgir, for offences un...