Search Results for "Delay Condone"

1019 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1019 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — State's Revision Petition Allowed. Trial Court's Fine of Rs.10,000 Increased to Rs.50,000 for Offence Under Section 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The State of Karnataka, through the Drug Inspector, Hassan Circle, filed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order Dismissing ROM Application as Time-Barred. Time Limit Under Section 129B(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Applies Only to Suo Moto Rectification, Not to Applications Filed by Parties.

The appellant, M/s. Allied Fibers Ltd., imported capital goods between October 1994 and September 1995. A show cause notice was issued on 24.03.1998 d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Delay Condonation Petitions as Withdrawn, Resulting in Rejection of Writ Appeals at SR Stage. Petitioner Sought to Withdraw Miscellaneous Petitions Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, Leading to Dismissal of Appeals Without Adjudication on Merits.

The petitioner, N.V. Rangaraju, filed two miscellaneous petitions under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 243-day delay in fili...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by BMTC and Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim — No Negligence by BMTC Driver Established. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the tipper lorry driver was solely negligent, and the compensation of Rs.25,000/- with interest was just and proper.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 19.08.2012 involving a BMTC bus (KA-01-F-4447) and a tipper lorry (AP-07-U-8783). The claimant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...